Normalization vs Denormalization

Schema Design is a Superpower

Welcome back to Zero2DataEngineer!

Today, we go deeper into how schema design can either streamline your data pipeline… or turn it into a spaghetti monster. we unpack how your database schema shapes everything — speed, cost, logic, scalability.

And no, it’s not just theory.

Good schema = fast queries, fewer bugs, and easier handovers.
Bad schema = JOIN hell, duplication drama, and angry dashboards.

---

What’s the Difference?

---

---

Normalization Forms (Real-World Style)

1NF – First Normal Form

• Rule: Atomic columns, no repeating groups

• Think of it like: Every drawer in your closet holds only one type of item

• Example:
  Bad: Phone Numbers = 123, 456
  Good: Separate rows per number

2NF – Second Normal Form

• Rule: 1NF + all columns depend on entire primary key

• Think of it like: No room for half-relevant details

• Example: Don't include Student Name in a table where the primary key is (Student_ID, Course_ID)

3NF – Third Normal Form

• Rule: 2NF + no transitive dependencies

• Think of it like: No gossip. Columns shouldn't depend on other non-key columns.

• Example: Move Department_Location to a separate Departments table instead of placing it in Employees.

---

Real Life Scenarios

Fintech Use Case: Normalized Schema (OLTP)

Let’s say you're working at a fintech startup on a banking system. You separate:

• Customer Table → updated rarely

• Accounts Table → moderate frequency

• Transactions Table → updated constantly

Why this works: Different update rates + data integrity + modular ETL pipelinesYour transactional system handles:

• Customers

• Accounts

• Transactions

Instead of storing everything in one big table, you normalize:

• One table for customer details

• Another for account info

• A third for transactions

Why?
Because each table changes at different speeds and scales. Transactions update constantly. Customers, rarely. This improves storage, indexing, and update reliability.